Today is one of those gross, winter days in Maryland where it is 35 degrees F and raining. The chill cuts all the way through you, especially when you're attending the funeral of a good friend. My friend Mark passed away suddenly on Monday from an aneurysm. He was 60 years old and leaves behind a loving wife, wonderful daughter, son-in-law, mother, brothers and nieces and nephews. I'll miss him immensely, as will many, many others.
Seems a strange way to start a blog on leadership, but there is a point. My family and I attended his wake and memorial prayer service at our home parish last night and his funeral today at his home parish. Mark's wife is the Pastoral Life Director at our church and for much of the last decade he worked extensively with the young people of our parish preparing them for confirmation. Speaker after speaker last night and today, even our own Archbishop, spoke of Mark's quite and peaceful nature and his creativity and unwavering service to the Catholic Church but more importantly to the youth of our church. That is most evident by the large number of teary eyed youth that were in attendance at the prayer service and funeral.
But beyond his obvious service to youth and the numerous local and national awards Mark won while doing that service, another notion was mentioned by many: Mark was always present and engaged. If you were with him, he was with you, no distractions, no random thoughts; he was engaged in your conversation. Mark looked you in the eye, listened to your words, watched your non-verbal language and heard both. I remember a conversation we were having three or four years ago and I guess I mentioned my daughter and some boy she was involved with at the time. My daughter was probably 14 at the time and his daughter was 24 or 25. Mark spoke of some of the boys that his daughter had brought home and how he embraced them until the relationship ended. Her current boyfriend at that time, now her husband, Mark recognized was different and he spoke of the joy he had of watching their love blossom. He didn't say it overtly, but I now realize he was helping me prepare for what I'm seeing now that my daughter is in college and is having more serious relationships. Mark wanted me to know, without saying it bluntly, that I was raising an intelligent and caring young woman who would make the right decisions in her relationships.
I never thought of Mark in terms of mentoring to me. My wife has helped with the confirmation classes for five or six years and I think she would agree that he mentored her. Reflecting on times when I spoke with Mark, I think he was mentoring me while also leading me to make good decisions about my family and my faith. I'm sure many, many others had the same experiences with Mark that I had. Maybe that's the most important leader of all: the quiet, unimposing leader.
I don't normally do "New Year's Resolutions." I typically try to take some time off at the holidays and reflect on what went well last year and how I can make next year better. But in listening and reflecting on what I've heard said about Mark, I'm going to try to be a better leader and mentor in 2015. I'm going to try to listen more and be distracted less. I'm going to try to leave my phone in my pocket when in meetings and engaged in conversations. I'm going to try to be more present with my team at work, my committee with CSI, the Mission and Planning Council at church, my sons' boy scout troop and cub scout pack and most importantly with our family. I think if I can all do these things, I'll be a better leader, better mentor and much better husband and father.
This started as an experiment to get me ready to be President of my CSI Chapter. Now, 17 years later, I've been Chapter President, Chapter Secretary, CSI national Board Chair and promoted to principal in our firm. What challenges await me as we move forward?
Sunday, January 04, 2015
Monday, November 10, 2014
Arcibasilica di San Giovanni in Laterano
This year, my parents celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary by taking my sister and I to Italy. We did a guided tour called "Highlights of Italy" which focused on Rome, Florence, Venice and Milan with a few stops in between. It was a beautiful trip, especially for me as an architect but also as a practicing Roman Catholic. The churches we saw, particularly in Rome, were breathtaking.
Yesterday at mass though, I reached a new appreciation for our trip. Yesterday was Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome which is the Arcibasilica di San Giovanni in Laterano or the Basilica of Saint John in Lateran. Before this trip, I would not have known this church or maybe even thought twice about what this feast day means. This church is the Basilica of Rome meaning this is the seat where the Pope, who is also the Bishop of Rome, would preside. Clearly, the Pope lives in the Vatican and conducts his business there, but this is the ceremonial seat of the Archdiocese of Rome.
It was very near our hotel, merely a short subway ride away, which is how we found it. We had an extra day in Rome before our guided tour started so we scheduled a trip to the Roman catacombs, the Appian Way and the Roman aquaducts. As we travelled out of Rome, our guide pointed out this church. Following the tour, we took the subway back to see it and am I glad we did! It is a beautiful church full of lots of symbolism.
Yesterday at mass though, I reached a new appreciation for our trip. Yesterday was Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome which is the Arcibasilica di San Giovanni in Laterano or the Basilica of Saint John in Lateran. Before this trip, I would not have known this church or maybe even thought twice about what this feast day means. This church is the Basilica of Rome meaning this is the seat where the Pope, who is also the Bishop of Rome, would preside. Clearly, the Pope lives in the Vatican and conducts his business there, but this is the ceremonial seat of the Archdiocese of Rome.
It was very near our hotel, merely a short subway ride away, which is how we found it. We had an extra day in Rome before our guided tour started so we scheduled a trip to the Roman catacombs, the Appian Way and the Roman aquaducts. As we travelled out of Rome, our guide pointed out this church. Following the tour, we took the subway back to see it and am I glad we did! It is a beautiful church full of lots of symbolism.
This is the original Roman wall and gate near the Lateran Basilica
The front of the Lateran Basilica
The apartments to the side of the main façade would have been for the Pope's apartments when not in residence in the Vatican
I'm not sure what this side monument is, but I liked it
View of the atrium
The copper doors into the church with my mom as scale figure
One of the side aisles
Detail of the flooring
View down the nave - note the alcoves with apostles
The alcove for St. Phillip
Alcove for St. Thomas
Pipe organ at the end of the nave
Half dome at the end of one of the side aisles
End of a side aisle
One of the chapels
The Main Altar
Da Vinci's Last Supper in Gold over the Altar
Some Cherubs
Beautiful Plaster Detail
Ceiling over the Nave
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
CONSTRUCT: The Must-Attend Event for Construction Professionals
CONSTRUCT 2014 and the CSI National Convention ended last
Friday and I'm exhausted but incredibly happy with the week I spent at the
convention center in Baltimore. When a large convention you regularly attend is
in your town, it’s a bit of a different experience. You've got your usual
carpool activities with your children and you feel like certain business
meetings should be attended, but then you are at the convention and want to do
all the things CONSTRUCT has to offer. I loved hosting all of my friends and
colleagues in my adopted city, but I will be glad to go to St. Louis next year
and be able to better focus on CONSTRUCT!
There were so many great things about this week and so
many exciting moments from CONSTRUCT.
•
Tuesday's
90-minute education sessions were fantastic! The 30 minutes between sessions allowed
for follow up and networking opportunities.
•
The
Welcome Reception was held outside in beautiful weather.
•
Each
new Fellow was welcomed by three of the endorsers reading from their own
endorsement letters; a very touching tribute!
•
The
Fellows Reception at the Top of World in the World Trade Center had breathtaking
views of downtown and the harbor and very tasty champagne!
•
Pablos
Holman offered us a glimpse into the mind of the hacker and how that affects
all of us - not just as construction professionals. Give him a look @pablos on
Twitter.
•
Our
bloggers panel offered a "Just Do It" pep talk on how to get started
expressing yourself through that medium and offered opinions from 5 different
bloggers plus our moderator, a talented blogger himself.
• The Exhibit Hall was a great spot for discussing new products, greeting old friends and learning in several different venues on the show floor.
•
The
Baltimore Chapter's Tall Ships Dinner Cruise offered a beautiful cruise through
Baltimore's Harbor on a glorious evening of networking and fun.
•
Tweet
Ups occurred in the manufacturer's booths and in the CSI booth while those
adept in the use of social media tried to show others the magic and benefits of
using it to better our businesses and our industry.
•
The
CSI Annual Meeting and Members Forum gave us the opportunity to come together,
discuss the future of our organization, hear from our leaders and honor those
who won awards this year.
Hanley Wood and our CSI leaders and staff proved once
again that they are a formidable pairing that puts on a fantastic convention.
Over the past eight years, I have attended CONSTRUCT each year but I have also
attended several other national conventions and conferences. I can say without
question or hesitation that every construction professional should attend
CONSTRUCT. The other conventions that I attended fell short of CONSTRUCT in
some critical area. Maybe they had great education, but their show floor was
thin. Maybe they were a niche organization good for professionals engaged in
that work, but not everyone in construction. Maybe they offered heady, academic
learning but little in the way of nuts and bolts offerings that help you every
day in your job.
CONSTRUCT offers it all. The education every year was
great, but this year's education sessions were definitely a notch up from
recent years. If you wanted technical seminars on air barriers, glazing systems
or engineering systems, you were covered. If you wanted to learn more about how
to specify certain systems or write a better Division 01, you were covered. If
you wanted to do your job better or grow into a leader in your chapter or firm,
you were covered. In one week, there was great education, presented by industry
leaders that will help you do your job better. I sat in the final session of
the week and learned how to better organize my project information to make our
projects more efficient in managing information and distributing it to the
project team. I used that knowledge first thing Monday morning when I returned
to my office. I cannot say that after attending other conventions, only after
attending CONSTRUCT.
The CONSTRUCT Exhibit Hall had every facet of building
material and software development covered, along with trade organizations that
support our industry. I needed some information on windows and spoke with
several different manufacturers on their offerings. If you needed information
on coatings or waterproofing or finish materials, you were covered. If you
wanted to see the latest ways to organize and edit your firm's master guide
specifications, you were covered. Combine that with the best exhibit hall food
I've had recently and the myriad opportunities to compare notes on practice
with other like-minded professionals and CONSTRUCT's show floor had it all.
And, you could find ice cream and beer by visiting the right booths!
Combine all of that with the evening activities -
fellowship induction, host chapter dinner cruise and CSI Night Out - CONSTRUCT has
the best balance of learning, networking and fun. New this year, the CSI Night
Out was the exclamation point on a great week. The food was good, the band was
great and the venue offered several different areas where you could dance or
listen to music, socialize in comfortable seating or watch the Ravens-Steelers
football game. CSI staff outdid themselves in planning that event!
This year was my ninth consecutive CSI National
Convention and tenth overall. I have attended every year that the CONSTRUCT
Show has existed and this was the best yet. I know I am biased, but I honestly
believe that every construction professional should attend CONSTRUCT. I've
attended other conventions and conferences and you cannot find the same the
education, networking and exhibit hall anywhere else for the impressively low
price of CONSTRUCT. You will learn things you can use at work next week. You
will meet people who can help you do your job better. You can get answers to
your questions about products from the people who know them best.
Sunday, August 10, 2014
CONSTRUCT in Baltimore: Come See the City I Love!
I grew up in
a small town in the Ozark Mountains in Arkansas. It was a great place to live
and there are many things that I miss it about it. During and after college, I
lived in Mississippi and after about five years in Jackson, MS, my wife and I
decided to relocate to Maryland. My wife had a great job opportunity here and I
was ready for a career and scenery change. After 15 years of living in
Baltimore, I can say I am in love with this city. I love everything about it:
the people, the history, the culture, the food. Its many neighborhoods offer a
great diversity of shopping and festivals and its rich history is fantastic to
experience and learn about.
In about one
month, my adopted city will host one of the great events in the construction
industry: CONSTRUCT 2014 and the CSI National Convention. I've attended this
convention each year since 2006 and have a great time each year experiencing
the education, product show and people that make this event and CSI as an
organization great. Most professional organizations have some sort of national
conference and I've attended several. All of
them are great events featuring education, idea sharing and lots of fun. Most
are held in great cities across our country and give attendees the opportunity
to see some things that they might not normally be able to see or experience in
their usual lives and careers. But because of the diversity of membership,
events and experiences, I think CONSTRUCT is the best convention available.
CONSTRUCT and
the CSI National Convention has taken me to cities that I've visited before
(Chicago and Nashville) and cities that I might not get to visit (Indianapolis
and Phoenix). It has taken me to cities close to home (Philadelphia) and now my
home chapter gets to host the convention again for the second time in seven
years. I was our chapter president in the summer of 2007 the last time CSI
visited our great city and found that I didn't have enough time to do
everything I wanted to do and see everyone that I wanted to see. In the years
since, I've gotten to know many, many more people, been a national committee
chair and am now a presenter at CONSTRUCT for not one but two seminars!
Seeing my
friends and colleagues at the various events of the week or just around the
convention center are always great experiences at CONSTRUCT. The educational
sessions are very exciting and thought-provoking. Walking the show floor learning about new
products and collecting chotchkies for my kids is a lot of fun. This year, I'm honored to be sitting
on the bloggers panel with Cherise Schacter, Lori Greene, Dave Stutzman and
Sheldon Wolfe being moderated by Eric Lussier. The humbling
experience of passing out well-earned and well-deserved awards as my duties as Awards
Committee Chair will be a highlight of the week as well.
While all of
these make CONSTRUCT the premier event of the AEC industry, this year the thing
that I am most looking forward to is showing people from across the country and
across the world our beautiful city. Within easy walking distance of the
convention center are many things to do and see after the convention
closes each day. The National Aquarium in Baltimore and the Maryland Science
Center are nearby for those who enjoy a little science while they're in town.
The Edgar Allan Poe House is a few blocks away on North Amity Street as is his
grave in Westminster Cemetery near the University of Maryland Baltimore. Sports fans should check out the Babe Ruth
Birthplace and Museum on Emory Street and the Sports Legends Museum directly
adjacent to the convention center.
There are
also many things to do and see along Pratt Street and the Inner Harbor
waterfront. On Thursdays at 100 Light Street, there is a lunch time farmers
market. The Inner Harbor's Harborplace offers shopping and restaurants in two
separate buildings. There are harbor taxis and other boating opportunities
along the water with great views of the Tall Ships that will be docked in port
as part of the Star Spangled Celebration: the culmination of three years of celebrations
highlighting Baltimore's and Maryland's involvement in our nation's history and
the writing of the Star-Spangled Banner, our National Anthem. Don't miss the food trucks that park at various spots around downtown offering great food at lunch time.
A short walk
from the Inner Harbor brings you to the Harbor East and Fells Point
neighborhoods. Harbor East is a new development along the water that features
high end restaurants and shopping. A favorite of mine is Chazz: A Bronx
Original, which is a pizzeria owned by actor Chazz Palminteri. A few steps
further brings you to Fells Point, an original seaport neighborhood of
Baltimore featuring quaint bars like The Horse You Came In On Saloon and Max's
Taphouse and shopping in several nautical themed shops. For those interested,
the #RunCSI course takes us through Harbor East to Fells Point and back to the
convention center on Friday morning.
These are
just a few of my favorites, so if you're heading to Baltimore for CONSTRUCT or
for any other reason, here are some links to check out:
csibaltimore.org
- the Baltimore Chapter's web site, so look us up and if we have a meeting or
event, be sure to register and stop by!
Baltimore.org
- the official travel site for Baltimore
godowntownbaltimore.com
- the Downtown Partnership web site has all kinds of information about living,
dining and entertainment downtown
starspangled200.com - the official web
site for the Star Spangled Spectacular celebrating 200 years since the writing
of National Anthem.
aqua.org -
The National Aquarium at Baltimore is right downtown, a mere three blocks from
the convention center and less from many of the hotels.
marylanzoo.org
- The Maryland Zoo in Baltimore is north of downtown in Druid Hill Park and is
one of the better zoos in America with new renovated exhibits and lots of
animals to see.
mdhs.org - the Maryland Historical
Society has some great history on their web site and their archives are on
Monument Street in the Mount Vernon neighborhood.
baberuthmuseum.org - web site for both
The Babe Ruth Birthplace and the Sports Legends Museums
For those of
you on Twitter, make sure to include these follows on your news stream:
@BaltoCSI
@starspangled200
@BaltimoreMD
@DTBaltEvents
@MDScienceCenter
@NatlAquarium
@LiveBaltimore
@BabeRuthMuseum
@MDSportsMuseum
I hope to see
you all at CONSTRUCT2014 and the CSI National Convention in beautiful
Baltimore, MD in September. If you have any questions about things to do or see
in downtown, please stop by our host chapter booth and just ask. We'll have
members ready to help!
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Building a Highly Collaborative Team
I've been learning about "lean construction" since
around 2006. I sat in a presentation at the CSI convention given by Greg
Howell, co-founder of the Lean Construction Institute. I was intrigued by the
idea of building a collaborative team of design and construction professionals
working together to create a building of higher value and higher quality,
rather than one that is built faster and at the lowest cost. I quickly
recognized that it would be some time before I could work in such an
environment. At the time, the lean construction trend seemed to be isolated to
the West Coast of the United States and I practice architecture on the East
Coast. Moreover, most of the work I do is with public universities and the
procurement laws of many states in our region preclude the creation of such a
team during the design phases. Procurement laws, and the risk tolerance of most
of our clients, trend toward traditional design-bid-build or some form of
construction manager at risk delivery methods.
Fast forward six years and I found myself involved in a
project that is trying to create a team with some of the tenants of lean
construction. Our firm is part of a team working on a very large biomedical
research building that is utilizing the design-assist delivery method for some
of the major trades. For those who may be unfamiliar with design-assist, the idea
is that trade contractors are brought to the project early in design to the
assist the designers in various aspects of the design, including material and
equipment selections and coordination among trades. The assistance continues through the documentation
phases and construction phase so they run more smoothly to deliver a building of higher
quality and at lower costs. The theory behind the design-assist method is very
sound and seeks to build a collaborative team that works together to provide
the client with the best possible project given the funds available.
Theory and practice can differ widely. We are about 24
months into a nearly five year project and the practice of design-assist has
not lived up to its promise at the onset of the project. I’ve been chronicling
some of the project on the Baltimore CSI Chapter’s blog, Felt Tips. As I
prepared several postings about various aspects of the project, I realized that
a longer and more interaction presentation could be made which might be
beneficial to all in our industry. I was focusing the blog postings on the
“collaboration sessions” that the construction manager organizes quarterly but
that was only a small part of the work that the team was undertaking. I began
to realize that things were being said “in the room” during those sessions that
weren’t being translated to outside of the room in our day to day interactions
on the project.
I submitted an abstract to CONSTRUCT for a presentation
titled “Building a Highly Collaborative Team.” My abstract was selected and I
will be presenting this presentation as Session T14 on Tuesday September 9,
2014 at 1:30 PM. The title is taken directly from the title of the
collaboration sessions on this project. When I initially submitted the
abstract, I intentionally picked that name because I thought that is what our
team was doing: building ourselves into a highly collaborative team. As time
has gone on, the title is becoming tongue in cheek because we are not, in fact,
a highly collaborative team because of the behaviors some of our members are undertaking.
I hope you find the abstract and this blog enticing enough to cause you to
attend my session!
While preparing for the presentation, I thought about the
team and its members and began to realize that the behaviors we are undertaking
are not always intentionally done so and if I can point them out to a larger
audience, we could greatly benefit as an industry. To start, let's talk more about
the project. I’ve given some clues above about it but I do not want to give too
much information because our collaboration sessions have been confidential and
I do not want to mention the client, project or team members by name. The
project is a large, biomedical research facility at a public university. It is
in excess of 400,000 GSF in size and has a construction budget in excess of
$200M. There are currently three schools within the university involved in the
design along with other stakeholders as you would expect: university project
management groups, various review architects and engineers as well as
operations and maintenance personnel. The A/E team is made up of three
architecture firms, a laboratory planning firm, five engineering firms, and seven
more specialty consulting firms. The construction manager now has a team of
seven people working full time along with four design-assist contractors and is
now procuring many other parts of the work, bringing in about a dozen other
trade contractors, with more coming on in the coming months. Management of this
team is a massive undertaking.
Idealistically, each of these parties brings something
different to the table. The owners want the largest building possible with no
additional financial outlay and a facilty that requires zero maintenance. The
designers want to build the most beautiful building possible to assist with
their own marketing efforts. The builders want to build the building as quickly
as possible with no quality requirements and an unlimited checkbook for any
changes they want to make. Obviously, I’m joking a bit about each of these
statements, but with so many differing parties, building a collaborative team
is of critical importance. Through the team building process of the last 18 months,
I’ve learned two things that I will expand upon here.
Top Down Collaboration Does Not Work. With a team this large
and diverse, these collaboration sessions could only accommodate the “project
manager” level position in each firm. Even then, there were typically 20 to 25
people in each session. Each project manager then has three to five, if not more,
people working with them to produce the work of their firm. From the owner's
side, there were typically four to five individuals at the project manager and
director level in attendance. In the initial session, one project executive
said that this collaboration model must rely on “top down collaboration”
meaning each person who attends the sessions is responsible for ensuring that
those working with them understand the principles set forth so that the
collaboration works. What I’ve found is very different. In some instances,
those managers in attendance are not interested in being collaborative, so the
top down model doesn’t work as there is no trickle down. But in other cases,
the culture of the firm does not allow for true collaboration, so the workers
outside of the sessions are unable to truly collaborate. In either situation,
the “top down” theory falls apart.
When Faced with Adversity, Teams Either Come Together or
Fall Apart. This is sort of an obvious notion, but is actually very
complicated. I can illustrate this in one example: the possibly unforeseen
condition. I use the word “possibly” because there can be disagreement among
the team members as to whether or not the condition is truly unforeseen. When a
situation arises and the team chooses to come together, several things can
occur. A meeting can be held with all relevant players where the situation is
reviewed and brainstorming occurs for potential solutions. No one points
fingers or worries about getting paid for their efforts. First and foremost,
the situation must be resolved so the project can move forward. At the end of
brainstorming, a direction is decided through the consensus and the players act
accordingly. This coming together can occur whether or not there is agreement
on the condition being foreseen or unforeseen.
The above scenario happened and I left the meeting happy
with the outcomes. The team agreed on the outcome which was shouldered by two
firms and the work quickly began as discussed. However, shortly after that
meeting, as the schedule delays and costs became more apparent, players came
together not collectively but by ones and twos and the team began to fall
apart. Site visits were held with only certain players present to review the
conditions. Two of the contractors active on site began to worry about schedule
and cost and so the CM began to work outside of the framework of the project
team to mitigate those concerns. The owner was contacted independent of the
design team and then the design team was expected to react based on innuendo
and rumor, not hard facts. Time slipped away based on lack of communication and
clarity.
As I post this blog, the situation above has not
reached its conclusion. To date, there is at least a three week delay in the
project. I became aware of the situation about one month ago. Activity on
resolving the situation did not reach a fever pitch until a meeting was held 16
days later. Yes, 16 days later on a situation that was holding up the progress
of a $220M project! There are a number of reasons for this delay, many of which
I’ll cover in more detail in my presentation, Session T14 on Tuesday September
9, 2014 at 1:30 PM. There are also many more real world situations that have
come out of this project and others I've worked on. I hope to see you all at my
session and at CONSTRUCT 2014 in beautiful downtown Baltimore! There are many,
many learning opportunities on topics that are intimately relevant to your work
every day. Come see us!
Monday, May 19, 2014
Its Not What You Know, but Who You Know
Driving to work in the mornings, I listen to CBS Radio's TBD in the Morning, a sports talk show hosted by Tiki Barber, Brandon Tierney and Dana Jacobsen. While they typically stick to hard sports news and analysis, the conversation sometimes splits off into popular culture items that interest them: usually music and movies. They also occasionally use Tiki's status as a retired NFL running back and the wealth that generated as a launching pad for various topics. One such conversation took place today.
While discussing Justin Timberlake's acceptance speech as Top Artist from the Billboard Music Awards the previous night, the trio quickly began discussing the less popular members of N'Sync and other boy bands from the 1980's. A web site was consulted that estimates various celebrity's net worth which led to a discussion of what happens when you have enough money to not work any more, regardless of age. I presume Tiki is in this situation and simply chooses to work in radio to fill the days and any emotional needs that he has related to his work ethic and sense of self worth.
Tiki is a 1997 graduate of the University of Virginia's McIntire School of Commerce where he concentrated in management information systems and earned ACC Honor Roll recognition. He likes to point out on air that he was also valedictorian of his high school graduating class. This is no dumb jock and today he confirmed my presumption about his financial net worth. But, Tiki took it a step further but saying life is not as much about what you know or what you do, but about who you know. He believes that much of his post-playing career success is related to some of the people he met while playing in New York for the Giants. I got the sense listening today, that he feels he may not have had the same opportunities after football had he been playing in a smaller market.
I sometimes feel the same way. For the past 15 years, I've practiced architecture in Baltimore, MD, a reasonably large city but one that has close proximity to Washington, DC and Philadelphia. Through my business activities, I've become acquainted with many professionals in Baltimore and in both Washington and Philadelphia. Just by doing my job day and day out, I'm amassed a reasonable network of professionals who know me, know my skills and could help me in my career.
The recent recession of 2007 through 2009 caused me to take a harder look at my professional network. I've been an active member of CSI since 2000. I attended my first national convention in Dallas in 2001 and I have attended every convention since Las Vegas in 2006. I can probably count the number of Baltimore Chapter meetings that I've missed in the last 14 years on the fingers of less than two hands. My involvement in CSI has caused my "reasonable" professional network to balloon into a great network of construction professionals from Burlington, VT to Dallas, TX to Portland, OR and many spots in between. When I looked at my professional network, I realized that it had little to do with the size market and I work in and everything to do with my involvement in CSI. From that moment on, I never feared being out of work because I know too many people to remain out of work for more than a few weeks.
Regardless of the size of your professional network, you can always work on growing and strengthening it. CSI is a great venue to do just that. Compared to many professional organizations, CSI's dues are reasonable and our local, regional and national events provide excellent value in education and networking opportunities. We have over 140 chapters so no matter where you live and work, there should be one or more chapters nearby. From now until May 31, 2014, CSI is running a membership special: join CSI and pay only $192 for national dues -- a 20% savings. To take advantage of this offer:
Log onto www.csinet.org/join
Select "Join Now", and then click "Sign Up as a New Member"
Enter Promotion Code CSIsocial14 when prompted
Click the "Add Discount" button
Make sure to also join a local chapter, where you can attend local education sessions and networking opportunities. While chapter dues are not included in this promotional offer, chapters provide an incredible value to already low national dues.
Get active and increase your knowledge and strengthen your network by Joining CSI today!
Tuesday, May 06, 2014
Do the Right Thing
I spent the better part of a recent Friday and the following Monday morning dealing with a problem that was not my doing. I have a client that has some particular contractual requirements. I can't name the requirements as it would give too much information away and is not germane to my points anyway. In December 2013, I was contacted by this client to prepare a fee for a renovation project similar to three other renovation projects we performed successfully with this client. For this new project, I was told to use the same consultant team we used on the previous three projects. Given these particular contractual requirements, we would not be able to entirely use the same team without a formal waiver from these requirements. Our client told me the waiver would be applied for and granted. It is now May 2014, I have submitted four different fee proposals based on changing scope from the end user and was told on that recent Friday that my original team has to be restructured to meet these particular requirements as there is now no time for the waiver process.
In the course of working with our client and their procurement officer, I found out that there is another way around these contractual requirements that could have been put in place in December 2013 which would have prevented me having to restructure our team. All that was required was the client's PM working more closely with the procurement officer and much of this could have been avoided. The process of altering the contractual requirements on the front end is remarkably simple: describe the project, list the design disciplines required, describe the client's desire for the same successful team and the procurement office can ease or eliminate some of the special contractual requirements. The "waiver" process has to be performed solely by the architect and is much more rigorous, time consuming and costly. In most cases, I have been told, the architect is not successful in gaining the waiver. The president of our firm, after looking at the waiver process, said it is doubtful our firm would ever willingly engage in that waiver process.
It appears to me that the PM and his immediate supervisor sought what they thought was an easier way to circumvent their organization's procedures and reach the same ends. For them, it might have been easier, but for me and our team, it was infinitely more difficult and the desired end was not met. The principal-in-charge from our firm, myself and members of at least six other firms have exerted countless hours in a pursuit that seems fruitless due to the imposition of these contractual requirements. I would conservatively say my firm alone has exerted nearly $5,000 worth of fee hours in the preparation of just this final round of fee proposals with the restructured team. I would estimate a similar effort or more for each of the previous four iterations of fee proposals.
I cannot fully fault the PM as he is new to the client's organization but his supervisor is a long-time employee who knows the procedures but willfully decided to not follow them. That decision alone has cost my firm and our consultant team thousands of dollars in effort spent correcting their mistakes. On the one hand, its all in a day's work and is the cost of doing business, but it does give me pause when such a simple procedure wasn't followed on their side and it cost my team money. This particular client is a government agency, so the concept of making money is somewhat foreign to them, but that is why we are in business. We love designing and helping build beautiful buildings, but we are not a non-profit. Continuously reworking proposals based on client whimsy directly affects our bottom line in negative ways.
In any business or endeavor, we should all do the right thing. Many rules, regulations and procedures are put in place for very good reasons. I'm not saying we should always blindly follow existing procedures without questioning them, but part of being a professional is knowing when to follow the procedures and when to question them and work to change them. For this client and project, some of these contractual requirements are mandated by State law while other requirements are goals or guidelines that the client has some leeway in reducing or eliminating. The procurement procedures were put in place to help the organization reach their legal requirements and their goals and guidelines. When the procedures are followed, the process can move very smoothly and fairly for all parties involved. In this case, when the procedures are circumvented, it caused all parties needless stress and caused our team to spend needless hours and financial resources to correct a situation that we did not cause.
I am a big proponent of mentoring. In this situation, the resolution wouldn't be strictly considered mentoring as the issue was more about education of a new employee rather than mentoring of an emerging professional. However, with a little mentoring on the part of the supervisor, the PM may have acted better. By doing the wrong thing, I believe the PM's supervisor has set the PM on the course of constantly doing things outside of the organization's procedures. The supervisor has potentially created a PM that provides disservice to the A/E teams they are seeking to hire and could potentially cause the organization to accept higher overall A/E fees to make up for the PM's actions. By simply doing the right thing, a new employee could learn the right way to handle his business and the A/E teams would be treated fairly and project initiation would go more smoothly.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Studying Project Teams
I hope you are all following my work on teaming and collaboration being published on the Baltimore Chapter's blog Felt Tips. Its a series of articles on a collaboration or "partnering" exercise that I am involved in on a large biomedical research project at a university in my area. It is also be used to form presentation T14 Building a Highly Collaborative Team to be presented at CONSTRUCT and the CSI National Convention in Baltimore in September.
Our collaboration team has met four times now, including today, and I've posted three blog posts on the effort. As of today, I am two meetings behind in my writing plus I'm working on a post related to our design development cost estimating and value engineering efforts. Though behind, I hope to catch up in the coming weeks.
In today's session, the project exec for the CM mentioned a research study taking place at a nearby university that peaked my interest. I'd rather not mention the university as I am trying to find out more information about the study and perhaps find their blog or other on-line items about the research. I'll report on that if I find anything.
Our collaboration team has met four times now, including today, and I've posted three blog posts on the effort. As of today, I am two meetings behind in my writing plus I'm working on a post related to our design development cost estimating and value engineering efforts. Though behind, I hope to catch up in the coming weeks.
In today's session, the project exec for the CM mentioned a research study taking place at a nearby university that peaked my interest. I'd rather not mention the university as I am trying to find out more information about the study and perhaps find their blog or other on-line items about the research. I'll report on that if I find anything.
In general, this research team is studying construction project teams and the influence of collaboration and holding members accountable through a series of surveys that are scored and reviewed quarterly. The results of the survey are then discussed by the team and used to alter behaviors to make the team more effective. According to the CM, there are several projects using this method and when compared against recent projects also performed for this same university, there are fewer RFI's, fewer change orders and fewer disputes.
A survey was created by the research team to assess the construction team members's respect for each other, their level of trust of each other, their sense of teamwork and when issues were raised, how the team communicated and work together in a timely manner. The construction team includes representatives of the university project management team, the CM at Risk and sub-contractors and the A/E team. The surveys are given using an on-line survey engine, like Survey Monkey. A designated group of day-to-day participants, like the project managers from each member firm, take the surveys quarterly and are asked to assess the performance on the Owner's team, the CM's team, the A/E team and the sub-contractors team in the categories listed above. A 1 to 5 scale is used with 1 being lowest. The goal is to target areas where team behaviors are lacking and take corrective steps to make the team function better.
The surveys are reviewed by an executive team made up of the VP in charge of the physical plant, the project executive of the CM firm and the principal in charge from the architect of record. All of these individuals are involved in the project but not a day to day basis. After reviewing the survey results, they would then ask the tough questions that need to be asked and work with the other team members to enact the necessary measures to improve the results.
My first thought was, "if I have a problem with an individual member of the A/E team, how can a survey asking me to rate the entire A/E team be of value in enacting change?" The CM cited an example of his own team. There was a superintendent on the team he described as the "Git 'er done" type who didn't have time to listen to or deal with anyone. He was dragging the entire team down with his brusque and rigid behavior. When the quarterly survey results came out, the CM firm was graded much lower than previous, so the executive team started asking questions. It came out that this superintendent was an issue and he was removed from the project.
That's probably an extreme case, but I can see other, less dramatic but equally effective results coming out of this exercise. The purpose of the exercise is to expose the "blind spots" or biases that we all have and hopefully allow each of us to work through them or set them aside for the betterment of the team. If all team members are held accountable by their fellow team members, the effectiveness of the team should be increased.
The collaboration team I'm involved in started the ground work for a similar survey today. I'll report on that effort on Felt Tips in the coming weeks.
A survey was created by the research team to assess the construction team members's respect for each other, their level of trust of each other, their sense of teamwork and when issues were raised, how the team communicated and work together in a timely manner. The construction team includes representatives of the university project management team, the CM at Risk and sub-contractors and the A/E team. The surveys are given using an on-line survey engine, like Survey Monkey. A designated group of day-to-day participants, like the project managers from each member firm, take the surveys quarterly and are asked to assess the performance on the Owner's team, the CM's team, the A/E team and the sub-contractors team in the categories listed above. A 1 to 5 scale is used with 1 being lowest. The goal is to target areas where team behaviors are lacking and take corrective steps to make the team function better.
The surveys are reviewed by an executive team made up of the VP in charge of the physical plant, the project executive of the CM firm and the principal in charge from the architect of record. All of these individuals are involved in the project but not a day to day basis. After reviewing the survey results, they would then ask the tough questions that need to be asked and work with the other team members to enact the necessary measures to improve the results.
My first thought was, "if I have a problem with an individual member of the A/E team, how can a survey asking me to rate the entire A/E team be of value in enacting change?" The CM cited an example of his own team. There was a superintendent on the team he described as the "Git 'er done" type who didn't have time to listen to or deal with anyone. He was dragging the entire team down with his brusque and rigid behavior. When the quarterly survey results came out, the CM firm was graded much lower than previous, so the executive team started asking questions. It came out that this superintendent was an issue and he was removed from the project.
That's probably an extreme case, but I can see other, less dramatic but equally effective results coming out of this exercise. The purpose of the exercise is to expose the "blind spots" or biases that we all have and hopefully allow each of us to work through them or set them aside for the betterment of the team. If all team members are held accountable by their fellow team members, the effectiveness of the team should be increased.
The collaboration team I'm involved in started the ground work for a similar survey today. I'll report on that effort on Felt Tips in the coming weeks.
Friday, April 11, 2014
Recognizing Your Volunteers
Based
on previous blogs I've written, most should realize how important I think
recognition is to all organizations, professional and otherwise. My involvement
in CSI awards started at my first chapter awards banquet in June 2001. That
night, I received a Certificate of Appreciation for helping with the chapter's
work with Rebuilding Together, Baltimore. Rebuilding Together is a program
where groups and organizations work on the homes of disabled or elderly people
on one Saturday in April. All I did was volunteer a Saturday doing minor home
repairs, but I was certainly honored and surprised to receive recognition that
night and it made an impression on me.
But,
the idea of recognizing volunteers for their hard work began to take place in
my mind when I was very young. Back in the 1970's, my parents were active in
our town's chapter of The Junior Chamber of Commerce, otherwise known as the
JayCees. My father has always been a wood worker and good with his hands. In
the years that he was chapter president, I remember him cutting out wooden
plaques and my mother using decoupage techniques to affix certificates to them.
While I was too young to attend the awards banquets, I'm sure the other volunteers
greatly appreciated a handmade gift that represented the work they had
performed for the JayCees.
Carrying
on up through junior high and high school, I was in the generation that started
the idea of the "participation ribbon." I can remember getting
various ribbons, patches and other items for participating in sporting, music
and other activities. Through my scouting activities, I always enjoyed
receiving the patches for various camporees, summer camps and other events.
These sorts of "participation" recognitions were important to me
growing up. They made me feel special and important, even if everyone else was
getting the same thing. Many scouters from that generation and earlier have
vast collections of patches to signify the activities and outings they
participated in. These mementos remind them of all the fun they had and they
things they learned.
I've
been involved in awards with CSI for 10 years. I started helping with the
chapter awards when my friend Liz was chapter president in FY2004. I was the
chapter Awards Committee Chair for a couple of years before becoming chapter
president in FY2007. As president, I fully participated in our chapter's awards
program for my two terms as president. Following my term as president, I became
an unofficial advisor and mentor to the chapter Awards Committee. Following
that work, I joined the Institute Awards Committee in FY2010 and took over as
chair in FY2013. I love the awards program that we administer and I wish more
chapters and leaders participated in it.
Recently,
my mother was cleaning out her attic and found some awards that my grandfather
had earned in the 1960's. He owned a residential and light commercial HVAC and
electrical contracting business. Sometime around 1965, Harbin Heating and Air
Conditioning became a Fedders dealer and for 1965-1966, my grandfather earned
"Most Progressive Dealer" in the state of Arkansas. Considering he
was a new dealer, I suspect this was akin to Rookie of Year for all Fedders
dealers in the state. He went on to be Top Dealer in Arkansas the following two
years. As you can see in the photos here, these were pretty nice plaques in
recognition of these accomplishments.
Recognition
has been going on for a long time and has been an integral part of most of our
lives. From participation ribbons to patches to plaques, physical recognition
is the most widespread and most obvious way participants and volunteers are
recognized. But there are many other ways to recognize volunteers. In the
Leaders Training Center last year at CONSTRUCT in Nashville, Matt Fochs with
CSI and I held a discussion on creating and building a recognition program for
our chapters and regions. That presentation can be found here and a recording
of a webinar I presented in February of this year can be found here.
The
point of the recognition program is to consider all forms of recognition
possible and move beyond the Certificate of Appreciation given in June of each
year, the Region Awards given at region conferences and the national awards
conferred at CONSTRUCT each September. Our volunteers should be recognized at
many times and in many ways to ensure they feel valued and understand that
their efforts are appreciated.
The
presentation from Nashville discusses the creation of a recognition model that
combines five different types of recognition: Participation, Self-set Goals,
Peer Competition, Standards of Excellence and Cooperation. Participation
recognition is the ribbons, patches and t-shirts that I mentioned above:
anything that identifies a volunteer as having participated in the event. Recognition
through self-set goals allows volunteers to set their own goals to measure
their own outcomes. Standards of excellence are the usual ways that we
recognize our volunteers: measure a volunteer’s service against a published
standard of excellence. Peer competitions are any ways that peers compete
against each other to determine a winner: specification writing contests are a
common example. Recognition by cooperation is a way in which an entire group
recognizes themselves as a separate entity that worked together to reach a
common goal.
All
five recognition methods listed above are essential to have a high quality and
robust recognition program. I encourage all chapter leaders to take a look at
the webinar and PowerPoint and consider ways to increase the level of
recognition in your chapters. Your volunteers deserve to be recognized each
month, not just in June or September.
If
you want to participate in the Standards of Excellence program known as CSI’s
Honors and Awards Program, there is still time to prepare nominations before the
deadline, but not much time! All nominations are due to CSI by 5:00P ET on
Friday, May 2, 2014. See www.CSINet.org/awards
for all the information you need.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



